
Recovering from the flu has taken longer than anticipated. I worked the same week, but would come home and sleep my evenings away. I'm just now starting to feel like I might make it. I haven't felt like blogging, but I have been reading.
I recently read a book called
The Shack. It's a fiction book about a man who goes to a shack and meets with God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. I was not turned on by the concept of the book at first, but I found myself enjoying the symbolism portrayed throughout. I know many Christians are not in favor of the book, because they think the author has been too liberal in his writing. However, I love the way that he inspired me to think in new ways. It was a literary challenge, and I didn't find any of the ideas he presented offensive any more than I found the Lion, Aslan, from Narnia, offensive.
One of the ideas I liked was that the trio had all of the time in the world to spend with the character, Mack. I kept thinking that surely God needs to get back to work doing other things. Doesn't he hear all those prayers that are beings spoken, and why isn't he responding to the "God-signal" like Bat Man instead of taking that leisurely walk with this numbskull who just doesn't get it? But, you know that's exactly how God would be. He's "ours" alone. He can do that because of being omnicient and omnipresent and all. He can walk and talk with us anytime we want. The trio is there at our personal beck and call 24/7. Another thing in the book is that Mack keeps asking "human" questions that the various cast of the trinity try to explain, but they warn first that it will be beyond his understanding. Sure enough, it get's deep quick. You know, that's how it is w/ God - simple, but deep. Haven't you been there? Other things that captured my attention: Jesus is not handsome, which suprises Mack a great deal; God is not an old man at first; the Holy Spirit is not human exactly - and they all love to eat!
Lastly, the message is about forgiveness and how easy it is to let our human-nature steal our joy. It is about relationship, and serving each other out of love not selfish expectation. It's got several other object lessons that are worth considering.
It would be a real stretch to say that the book is scripturally accurate. I'm not even sure that was the goal of the author. There are problems with the representation of the trinity. There are a few comments about free will that seemed off-kilter. There was some interpretation problems with the section on judgment. I have included a link to one
review that seemed to address some of these concerns thorougly. You must remember that
The Passion of the Christ had similar critics. But, as a whole, I thought it was a positive contribution as well.
Listen folks, The Bible is the Word of God - anything else is interpretation. The Bible does say, "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true. Acts 17:11" I do not read books or watch movies to get my "truth". But, I personally think that it's OK to challenge our minds to explore and ponder the life of Christ, the character of God and the nature of the Spirit. If you have never looked at Jesus and let yourself wonder what he was really like, take this time leading up to Easter to consider it. I think of the human Jesus who did a super-human task for ME, that I might have a personal relationship with the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost! AMEN!